For Surgeons & Physicians

Transform Clinical Outcomes & Patient Experience1

SOMAVAC® delivers deep tissue negative pressure therapy: continuous sensor-controlled suction at −100mmHg directly into the wound space. A better surgical recovery experience for your patients.1

Reduce risk of complications. Faster drain removal. Patients who love the experience.1 24/7 support so your staff isn’t fielding drain calls.

In Use at Leading Institutions

Ohio State University Naval Medical Center Baptist Memorial UMMC Hoag
The Problem & The Solution

Deep Tissue Negative Pressure Therapy

Cross-section showing seroma fluid accumulation between tissue layers

The Problem: Seroma

Fluid accumulates in the dead space, preventing tissue healing

Cross-section showing negative pressure therapy creating tissue apposition

The Solution: Deep Tissue Negative Pressure Therapy

Continuous −100mmHg removes fluid and promotes tissue apposition1

Deep tissue negative pressure therapy: Step 1 removes fluid, Step 2 holds tissue layers together
Surface vs. Deep Tissue

If You Like Surface Negative Pressure Wound Therapy, You’ll Love This

Already using Prevena or similar surface negative pressure wound therapy? SOMAVAC® is the natural complement, same proven negative pressure technology, applied where it’s never been before: directly into the deep wound space.

Surface Negative Pressure Wound Therapy

Traditional Surface Devices

  • Pressure on incision surface
  • Helps surface tissues approximate for incision healing
  • Does not remove fluid from deep wound space
  • Does not create deep tissue apposition or promote ADM integration

SOMAVAC® Deep Tissue Therapy1

First & Only

  • Continuous −100mmHg into the deep wound space
  • Removes fluid to prevent seroma formation
  • Creates tissue apposition for proper healing
  • Reduces infection risk by eliminating waste fluid
See It In Action

How SOMAVAC® Works

SOMAVAC belt system with pump, connectors, and collection bag

As flat as a phone, worn discreetly on a belt under clothing. Connects up to 4 surgical drains.

Practice Benefits

Elevate Your Standard of Care

SOMAVAC® Deep Tissue Therapy delivers measurable improvements across the metrics that matter most to your practice.1

Faster Drain Removal1

Continuous −100mmHg deep tissue suction removes fluid faster than passive bulbs. 11.4 days on average, as early as 8.3 days, up to 30% sooner.*

Reduced Risk of Complications1

Fully closed system minimizes surgical site exposure. In the Walker study, SOMAVAC® patients had a 0% seroma rate (vs. 13.6%, p=.009). Timely removal reduces infection risk, which triples after 3 weeks3.

24/7 Patient Support

Fewer drain-related calls to your staff. Our U.S.-based team answers the phone 24/7 (real people, no robots) so your patients get help without burdening your office.

Reduced Reoperations

1 in 5 women require reoperation with traditional drains4. In the Walker study, SOMAVAC® delivered an 86% reduction in reoperations (2% return to OR vs. 13.6%, p=.05)5.

Higher Patient Satisfaction

Patients rated SOMAVAC® easier to use than a thermometer. SUS score: 93.1 (“best imaginable”) vs. 46.7 for JP bulbs.*1,6

Fewer Follow-Up Visits

Faster drain removal and fewer complications reduce post-operative office visits, freeing clinical time and improving throughput.1

The Patient Experience Gap

Your Patients Hate Drains More Than You Think

A 2025 peer-reviewed study of 203 patients reveals just how much surgical drains impact quality of life.7 Most surgeons know patients dislike drains, but they don’t realize how much until they see the data.

Patients in communities where SOMAVAC® is available have started requesting it by name, and some are choosing their surgeon based on who offers it. This isn’t just a clinical upgrade. It’s a practice differentiator.

“I’m kind of embarrassed to admit this, but I didn’t realize how much my patients disliked the drains. After my first case with SOMAVAC, and hearing how grateful my patients were to not deal with the bulbs, it completely changed my perspective on the recovery experience.”

Board-certified plastic surgeon, after first use

Patient Attitudes on Surgical Drains7

N = 203 • Gadiraju et al. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Global Open, 2025

Drains were a significant aspect of my recovery

90%

62.1% strongly agree • 28.1% agree

Drains made it harder to complete daily tasks

85%

47.3% strongly agree • 37.4% agree

Drains negatively impacted my quality of sleep

77%

44.8% strongly agree • 32.0% agree

Drains negatively impacted my mood

66%

35.5% strongly agree • 30.5% agree

Knowing I’d need a drain would make me apprehensive about future surgery

37%

16.3% strongly agree • 20.7% agree

I would prefer surgeons who use improved alternatives to existing drains

65%

34.0% strongly agree • 31.0% agree

Clinical Evidence

Data That Speaks for Itself

30%

Drains Out Sooner1

11.4 days on average, as early as 8.3 days, vs. 16.3 days with JP bulbs. SOMAVAC group (n=45), p=0.003.

86%

Reduction in Reoperations1

86% reduction in return to the OR: 2% vs. 14% with JP bulbs in the Walker study (p=.05, n=49).5

9.27

Patient Satisfaction1

Mean satisfaction on the Likert scale in the Walker study (p=0.008, n=49).

Average Time With Drains1

Prospective mastectomy study • N=45 • p=0.003 • Data on file

11.4 days

SOMAVAC®

16.3 days

JP Bulbs

Nearly 5 fewer days with drains

Ease of Use (SUS Score)1,6

Patient-reported • 0 to 100 scale • p=0.0008 • Data on file

46.7

JP Bulbs

93.2

SOMAVAC

82

Thermometer

78

Inhaler

Rated “best imaginable” on SUS scale. Thermometer & Inhaler: Kortum & Peres (2015). Data on file.

*Early clinical results. Data on file. References: Walker et al. (in review); Hanna et al. (2016); Kortum & Peres (2015).

JP Bulbs Do Not Provide Continuous Suction1,8

Ability of drain to collect fluid: 100-mL bulb

160 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 Negative pressure (mmHg) 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Volume of fluid in bulb (mL) SOMAVAC −100mmHg
100-mL bulb: Full squeeze
100-mL bulb: Bottom pushed in
SOMAVAC® constant −100mmHg

JP bulb suction drops to <40mmHg within 30mL of fluid collection. SOMAVAC® maintains a continuous −100mmHg.

*Carruthers et al. 2013. Optimizing the Closed Suction Surgical Drainage System. American Society Plastic Surgical Nursing.

Drains Out Sooner With SOMAVAC®1

More fluid out up front means patients enter the remodeling stage sooner, so drains can come out at your discretion, days earlier.

Representative Drain Output1

0-1 Day 0-4 Days 3 Days-3 Weeks 3 Weeks-2 Years 200 150 100 50 0 Average Drain Output (cc) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Hemostasis Inflammation Proliferation Remodeling
SOMAVAC®
No SOMAVAC®

*Data on file

Study at a Glance

30% Faster Drain Removal1

Continuous suction vs. passive bulb drainage

Simplifies Post-Operative Experience1

Efficient deep tissue fluid removal via one device

Easier Than a Thermometer1,6

Patient-reported System Usability Scale scores

Continuous Sensor-Controlled Suction1

Maintains −100mmHg, no manual compression needed

Fully Closed System

One-way connectors minimize surgical site exposure

150-Patient Study1

Presented at SESPRS and in review: 0% seroma (p=.009), 86% reduction in reoperations (p=.05), 9.27 satisfaction (p=.008), n=49

Clinical Applications

FDA-Cleared for Seroma Prophylaxis

SOMAVAC® is indicated for removal of bodily fluids following large flap forming plastic and general surgeries. Most commonly used in:

Mastectomy

Reconstruction

Hernia Repair

Abdominoplasty

Paniculectomy

Surgeon Testimonials

What Surgeons Are Saying

“Since using SOMAVAC in my breast and abdomen cases, I have not taken a single patient back to the Operating Room for seroma or revision surgery due to a postoperative complication.”

Marc E. Walker, MD, MBA

Plastic & Hand Surgery, UMMC, Jackson

“SOMAVAC feels like a true step forward! What was once an uncomfortable part of recovery is now streamlined, clean and far easier for the patient and surgical team!”

Regina Fearmonti, MD

Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Alon Aesthetics, San Antonio

“SOMAVAC is an exciting new technology designed to enhance patient recovery and improve overall outcomes. Early feedback indicates significant improvements in patient comfort and satisfaction.”

Aldona Spiegel, MD

Director, Center for Breast Restoration, Houston Methodist Hospital

Economic Impact

The Case for Your VAC Committee

Seroma complications drive costly reoperations and readmissions. SOMAVAC® Deep Tissue Therapy addresses the root cause, delivering measurable savings.

$204K

Savings per 100 surgeries

$10.7K

Mean cost per SSI (Olsen et al.)9

86%

Reduction in reoperations: 2% vs. 14% with bulbs (Walker)1

Economic model based on published literature and clinical data. Reoperation costs estimated at $25K to $46K per event. SSI data from Olsen et al. (2008). Covered within the overall cost of surgery.

Frequently Asked Questions

Clinician FAQ

Get Started

Bring SOMAVAC® to Your Practice

Our clinical team handles onboarding, training, and ongoing support to integrate SOMAVAC® into your workflow.

Clinical consultation & product demo

Our team walks through the device, data, and integration process

VAC committee support

We support you through the VAC approval process

Full clinical data package

Early results, SUS scores, peer-reviewed references

Staff training & patient education materials

24/7 U.S.-based patient support included: (833) 766-2822

Physician (New)